StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name Professor Class Date I. Argue for or against the social contract theory Hobbes There are two philosophers who wrote about social contract theory that I will argue for and against. They are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. I will argue against the claim of Hobbes that human life, by default, is anarchaic and is characterized by misery and chaos…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them"

Download file to see previous pages

I am more inclined to believe that man by default is good and influenced by his or her environment where he can be better or slide into misery, as Hobbes argues. Misery and chaos are not the natural conditions of man but, rather, the blank state or tabulasa rasa subject to the condition and influence of the society, environment and government. Hobbes’ argument about the basis of government is also flawed, as per the statement that government is formed by its citizens’ giving up some of its destructive rights to have a government.

While it may be partially correct that people must cede or limit some of their freedoms to achieve order, it does not necessarily mean giving up their freedom. Simply, government was not created on the basis of men agreeing not to kill or rob each other; rather because it is better for them if there is a government to set the direction of what the ideal behavior in society is and to protect their rights and freedom. Locke Locke agreed with Hobbes in the fundamental need for a government. They, however, differ in the reason and principle for forming such government.

For Locke, government is created by people who agree to bind together and form a government who would look after them for their protection and security of their lives, properties and their freedom. I am inclined to agree with the proposition of Locke because, unlike Hobbes, Locke’s philosophy is hinged on morals where people agreed to bind each other for their mutual protection and security and not because they cannot be left on their own as they are chaotic and miserable, as what Hobbes contended.

One of the many facets of Locke’s argument I like is his idea of the basis of government’s legitimacy. I believe he started the idea of democracy. For Locke, government must have the consent of the governed to preside over them. This principle is the basis why we have elections and why the elected officials are beholden to the people and why the people are sovereign compared to the old principle of Divine Right of Kings where kings ruled even without the consent of the governed. This idea of Locke that the government must have the consent of the governed has also its safeguard mechanism against the abuses and incompetence of the government.

In cases where government and its officials are abusive, incompetent or corrupt, the governed can hold them accountable during elections by not voting for them, thus, removing them from office. In extreme cases, it is possible to even change the government itself through revolution, as what we have seen in many countries where dictators were toppled because the governed no longer wanted authoritarian rule. Above all, I agree with Locke’s social contract because the Declaration of Independence which is the basis of our government was based on Locke’s social contract theory.

Without Locke’s idea of social justice, America as a society will be something else, which could be far from the ideal and not what it is today. II. Government responsibility for the citizens I am more inclined to believe in Rawl’s theory of justice. In Rawl’s theory of justice, he advance two kinds of justice, one of which is the merit theory;as the title suggests, it rewards the person depending upon one’s contribution to society. The other one which is more applicable to this case is the need theory which posits that

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth) Essay”, n.d.)
Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth) Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1468565-government-social-contract-theory-and
(Government (social Contract Theory and Redistribution of Wealth) Essay)
Government (social Contract Theory and Redistribution of Wealth) Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1468565-government-social-contract-theory-and.
“Government (social Contract Theory and Redistribution of Wealth) Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1468565-government-social-contract-theory-and.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them

Rawls and Nozick's Theories of Justice

The egalitarianism of Rawls is based on the social contract theory however there is also some contradiction as he starts with a very liberal assumption about humans and then gives very broad conclusion in terms of egalitarianism considering distribution of wealth as fair by the people(hawk n.... He further provided justification about the concept of re-distribution of wealth based upon the individualist assumptions.... This theory of Rawls is well-matched to the concept of a market economy whereby the re-distribution of wealth is done in terms of tax and welfare systems that ultimately leads to disincentive to firms and ultimately turns out disadvantageous for the least well-off....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Idea of Health in Dependency Theory and the Theory of World Systems

When a nation is marked timing in development since it cannot accumulate a substantial amount of wealth, then there comes a time when it can hardly afford to facilitate the health and education of its citizens.... The paper "The Idea of Health in Dependency theory and the Theory of World-Systems" tells that world-systems theory emphasizes the interconnections of countries in the global capitalist production process, which results in an uneven distribution of profits across the countries....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Political Philosophies and Taxation

Name Subject Date Political philosophies and Taxation There are various political philosophies in the world, and each of them possesses a considerably different view on the role of government in ensuring equality through taxation and other initiatives.... Rawls points out in his theory that an unequal distribution of wealth and income is acceptable if those at the bottom of the society are better off than it is possible under any other distribution (Rawls 85)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Theories of Justice - Nozick's Theory of Distributive Justice, Compared to Rawls

hen speaking of how Rawls and Nozick have different view points their ideas of the "separateness of persons," Adam Swift says: "What if I am one of the people made unhappy for the sake of other people's happiness"[6].... Nozick's objection to redistribution is that it uses some people as "means to other people's ends" This derives from Immanuel Kant's notion that we should not "treat others as means to our own or other people's ends, but as ends in themselves....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Wealth distribution. Wealth tax and estate planning

Government policies can gear towards the redistribution of wealth to the rich and poor respectively.... The act of wealth distribution itself cannot achieve 100% efficiency due to the maintenance of structures to collect and redistribute it.... However if a certain society implements wealth distribution by means of persuasion valued on the different capital and the production of wealth, the rich once in a while can be mandated to give away at least a small part of their extra assets to the poor....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Hobbes and Rousseau Can Be Categorized as Social Contract Theorists

Thomas Hobbes theory came about during a civil war brought about by antagonism between two powerful fronts, each of them claiming the right to wield more power than the rival group.... Hobbes represented a compromise between the fighting According to him, they needed to understand that they are equal to one another, and none of them is invested with him any authority to govern the rest.... one of the theories stems back to an essay he had written, Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men, now famously known as the Second Discourse....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Utilitarianism with the Taxation Policy

one of the approaches that influenced a lot the theorists when examining and explaining the behavior of persons in their society has been the utilitarianism.... The current paper examines the relationship between the utilitarianism and the policies followed for the redistribution of tax by the countries in the international community.... But the utilitarian account of equal treatment falls well short of egalitarian nonsubordination because it never compares individual fortunes against one another....
20 Pages (5000 words) Term Paper

A Critique of Plato's Just Society Using the Notion of Fairness From John Rawls

one of the first preliminary aspects of the soul is that although the parts of the soul are distinct in their virtues, Socrates also stresses that in the functioning of these parts, the soul must be considered as a “whole” [Plato, 1992, p.... By contrast, Rawls viewed inequality as created by the distribution of wealth, and while Plato's ideal was a harmonious soul, Rawls ideal was equality itself.... The author states that Rawls views the just state as one that has equality as its aim....
14 Pages (3500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us