StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis of Evaluation Theory - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
This research paper " Analysis of Evaluation Theory" presents evaluation theories. All evaluation theories get formed on the basis of social inquiry, social accountability, and fiscal control. Evaluation theories serve various purposes but their main function is acting as a guide to practice…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.7% of users find it useful
Analysis of Evaluation Theory
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis of Evaluation Theory"

? Analysis of evaluation theory In this literature review, focus gets provided on the purpose of evaluation theories and their methods. The paper begins with a brief introduction and overview of what is evaluation theory. The body of the literature focuses on three purposes of evaluation theories and their interaction with evaluation methods. The body literature then offers an analysis on the interaction of evaluation theories and methods and how it is vital to strike a balance between the two subjects of evaluation. The paper concludes with a summary of the literature review presented in the entire paper. Introduction There are a range of evaluation theories that can confuse new practitioners and learners who intend to grasp on ways of evaluating programs. Examples of these evaluation theories include; goal free, empowerment, utilization- focused, and developmental (Lisa, 2006). The different forms of evaluation sprout from the same base of social accountability, social inquiry, and fiscal control (Valerie, 2004). From this base, evaluation orientations further branches out into three main areas; use, methods, and valuing. It is from these branches, various evaluation perspectives from various thought leaders get obtained. These perspectives get to offer learners and researchers on the various evaluation methods, their application, and how to align themselves with the evaluation orientation that best matches their program context or values (Darlene, 2008). It is vital that evaluators get to understand the cross cutting evaluation theories and terminology that is available for the stakeholders. It is vital that new and skilled evaluators get to determine and understand what the various evaluation theories or methods are for. Purpose of evaluation theories and methods Evaluation theory serves various purposes. However, its vital function is to act as a guide to practice. It is incomprehensible to learn on the latest methodological advancement without understanding the relevant evaluation theory concerned (Eleanor, 2013). This situation creates a scenario where evaluators get to learn what to do without understanding why or when to do what they do. It is vital that a good evaluator gets to understand the evaluation theories so that they can choose and employ the appropriate methods. Evaluation theories assist the evaluators past simply making good judgments on what kind of methods to employ but rather under what situations, and towards what kinds of evaluation influence. First off, evaluation theories help to bring back prior experience and thus consolidate lessons learned. Evaluation theories can help evaluators to posses a sophisticated and deep understanding of how organizations carry out their decisions and get influenced by evaluation findings (Lisa, 2006). Knowledge of the theories assists evaluators to learn from other people or organizations experiences. Evaluators who fail to grasp the knowledge of evaluation theories risk repeating past mistakes, which also leave them vulnerable to failure to sustaining and building on past successes. Secondly, the comparison of evaluation theories assists those in the field in determining and understanding the vital areas that illicit debate within the field. Through comparison of the evaluation theories, one gets to determine the gaps present within the field and how they affect their field. This comparative look at the evaluation theories assists evaluators to garner on what issues remains unsettled and elusive in their field of practice (Sung, 2002). Undertaking a look at the different theories present in the field assists the practitioners to obtain different perspectives on what the purpose of evaluation is or how it should get employed. Thirdly, it is vital that evaluators get to embody the knowledge of evaluation theories such that it becomes a part of their identity. Evaluation theory in its embodiment is the basis and core of becoming an evaluator (Valerie, 2004). The knowledge of evaluation theories assists those that enter into the field of evaluation to grasp on how to employ the methods of evaluation. The grasp of evaluation theories assists to distinguish those in the field from other people in other fields who might possess equal or superior methodological expertise. The diversity obtained from the various ways that people join the field of evaluation should get used as reinforcement for people to understand the importance of studying evaluation theories. Finding a balance between evaluation theory and methods The choices of methods can become harder for evaluators who posses more knowledge on evaluation theories. This is so because different evaluation theories undertake different perspectives on what the uses of evaluation should get focused on, and how evaluation should get conducted in achieving those uses. Different leaders offer different and various perspectives on the use and employment of evaluation theories (Sung, 2002). These perspectives make the task of selecting an evaluation theory for a program daunting. It is vital for evaluators to learn how to make these choices without relying on implicit choices. Evaluation theories can assist in making choices on methods (Lisa 2006). Some of the evaluation theories cover a very wide base, which provide evaluators with an easy task of selecting them for various programs. Such theories appear to cover and match various methods that can get employed by practitioners. It is vital that learners and practitioners get to understand the different theories and various perspectives so that they can avoid selecting a single theory as their preferred choice in solving and understanding all problems they encounter (Darlene, 2008). By understanding the various perspectives, evaluators can begin to have a common ground in relation to making choices about methods. Most evaluation theories are contingent in nature. They seem to advocate for different approaches under different situations (Valerie, 2004). This nature of evaluation theories allow for evaluators to get to learn and obtain knowledge on the various perspectives offered by multiple evaluation theories. Familiarity with contingent evaluation theories assists those in the field to decipher the reasons for not using one evaluation design over the other. The ideal balance between theories and methods can get struck if evaluators and practitioners within the field get to become multilingual in terms of their knowledge of evaluation theories (Darlene, 2008). Knowledge of the various perspectives of different theories assists practitioners to broaden their understanding and easily make choices over time. It is vital to strike a balance on the knowledge of theories and the methods dispensable. This balance creates room for making informed choices. Conclusion There is a range of evaluation theories. All evaluation theories get formed on the basis of social inquiry, social accountability, and fiscal control. Evaluation theories serve various purposes but its main function is acting as a guide to practice. The knowledge of evaluation theories is vital for evaluators and beginners within the field of evaluation. It is paramount that practitioners within this field get to learn on the theories so that they can get to grasp on how to make choices of the methods available and how to employ the chosen methods of evaluation. Knowledge of the evaluation theories also assists those within the field to have a multi faceted approach towards solving and understanding problems that require evaluation. References Darlene, R. (2008). Improving the quality of evaluation participation: a meta-evaluation. Human Resource development International, 11 (1), 35-50. Eleanor, C. (2013). Balancing Evaluation Theory and Practice in the Real World. American Journal of evaluation, 34 (1), 91-98. Lisa, W. (2006). Commonly held theories of human resource development. Human Resource Development International,1 (1), 75-93. Sung, Lee. (2002). Dimensions and design criteria for developing training reaction evaluations. Human Resource Development International, 5 (1), 175-197. Valeria, Stead. (2004). Business focused evaluation: a case study of a collaborative model. Human Resource Development International, 7 (1), 39-56. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“HRD assignment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1490952-hrd-assignment
(HRD Assignment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/english/1490952-hrd-assignment.
“HRD Assignment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1490952-hrd-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis of Evaluation Theory

Evaluation methods for the proposed IAMS framework, model, and system

Methods that can use of empowerment evaluation include analysis of expert questionnaires, such as those collected for the purpose of this research (Fetterman, 2007).... The appropriate evaluation method should reveal the most appropriate elements that would provide user opinions for an acceptable integration model for the physical and virtual identity management systems.... The evaluation methods should have the capacity to test the components that constitute the conceptual model, so that the final model merges seamlessly with user expectations and usability preferences....
11 Pages (2750 words) Thesis

Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications

This essay "evaluation theory, Models and Applications" sheds some light on the evaluation that requires a lot of effort from the management since it involves the political, economic, and organizational perspectives in an organization.... However, these two strategies of evaluation can be used interchangeably (Research Methods, 2012, para.... Scientific experimental models are used in social sciences as well as in physical sciences to determine the accuracy of a given theory or scientific process as formulated by scientists or theoreticians....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Health Program Evaluation

In this type of evaluation, impartiality, accuracy, objectivity, and validity become very important.... If one is using the formative model, they may ask, "What is the definition and scope of the problem or issue, or what's the question" and if it is of the summative style, "What type of evaluation is feasible" Once the question is formulated, there is a planning evaluation cycle that takes place throughout the process.... hp An evaluation culture or the consistent use of evaluation is extremely important....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Essentials of Economic Evaluation in Health Care

Economic evaluation is the 'comparative analysis of alternative courses of action in terms of both their costs and consequences' (Drummond et al, 2005).... For funding to be possible, these programs must undergo evaluation regarding its effectiveness and efficiency.... conomic evaluation is a methodology that is being used increasingly to help clinicians and policymakers think about these hard choices.... When measuring the effects of health programs on both resource consumption and health, economic evaluation allows us to see how much health care 'bang' we are getting for our 'buck....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

The Emergency Evacuation and Quarantine Program

Moreover, the evaluation process will also aid in identifying the target area where the CDC would focus on with utmost importance.... In this respect, it can be comprehended based on the evaluation that the CDC with the assistance of the programs will be facilitated in providing better health security....
13 Pages (3250 words) Assignment

Similarities and Dissimilarities between Research and Evaluation

It examines the central characteristics of research and evaluation such as validity, generalization, theory, and their usefulness in the decision-making process as well as the roles those characteristics play in each Evaluation and research differ in degree along dimensions of generalizations of both particularization and generalization as well as decision oriented and conclusion oriented that serve as the basis of distinctions.... Evaluation tends to improve the existing program for the target population but research always tends to prove a theory or hypothesis....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Analysis of Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation by Wholey, Hatry and Newcomer

Evaluation assessment is also essential in evaluating program designs, exploring the reality of programs, and ensuring that programs meet the objectives and goals, there is a clear definition of priority information, the clients and evaluators concur with the intended utilization of evaluation info.... "analysis of Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation by Wholey, Hatry and Newcomer" paper examines the articles in which the authors explored how educators, consultants, analysts and managers in public and private institutions can evaluate and assess program results....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Analysis Interpersonal Meaning: Media Observation Genre

The analysis in this paper is staged through observation and comments that followed, which dictates the literal and linguistic analysis of the component of the feeling of the writer, Justin McCurry, such as effect, appreciation, judgment, and engagement.... The writer of the paper 'analysis Interpersonal Meaning: Media Observation Genre' states that from the writer's perspective (feeling), the world praises the speed at which Japan has risen to control the Fukushima Nuclear Plant crisis, but the crisis is seriously very far from control....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us