StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia" it is clear that active euthanasia, when the only alternatives left to end the suffering are miracle and death, is a personal right, is as morally correct as passive euthanasia, and bestows dignity in death. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia"

?Areum Son Mrs. Woodard EH102-QMQ 4/29/13 Final Draft: Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia Over two decades ago in Britain, Dr. Nigel Cox administered a lethal dose of potassium chloride to Lillian Boyes, killing her within minutes. Mrs. Boyes had been was terminally ill, and in the weeks before she died, her pain worsened that even extremely high doses of diamorphine or heroin do little to alleviate her pain. She wanted a voluntary active euthanasia. Even Mrs. Boyes’ two sons supported this. Dr. Cox believes he acted in his patient’s best interests, but he was treated like a common criminal in the courts. By definition, respected dictionaries, internet search engines, and the opinion of several people all agree that euthanasia is “mercy killing” --- an act of intentionally ending one’s life in order to end insurmountable suffering. Dr. Cox did active euthanasia and it is considered a sin and a crime. Passive euthanasia is legal and is done by withholding life-sustaining assistance, while active euthanasia (physician-assisted) involves acts that will hasten someone’s death (Green 641). Although many people think that active euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, is morally wrong and is a total disregard for the sanctity of life, three reasons why physician-assisted suicide is morally right are that it is a respect for the paramount right of an individual to execute sovereignty on matters that concerns only the self, it is the same as passive euthanasia, and it provides dignity in death (Green 640). First, opponents claim that active euthanasia disregards the individual’s right to life. It is claimed that the aim of medicine is always to look for ways to cure an illness, which is rooted in the idea of prolonging a person’s life. It is claimed that there is also a possibility that an ill person may be under pressure to choose euthanasia rather than be a burden to other family members. There is also the possibility of misdiagnosis or miscalculations by doctors, and death can no longer be reversed (Linville 201-2). There is no denying that the logic of these claims have value. However, while people focus on an individual’s right to life, it is forgotten that the individual also has an absolute right over matters that concerns only the person who is involved. This means that to be able to exercise the right to choose life or death is a paramount right for every individual in the event when no intervention or help can be currently applied or given to alleviate the person’s condition. An individual must have the right to decide and choose if the remaining solutions to end the intolerable suffering are merely between miracle and death. Regarding medical misdiagnosis or miscalculations, while it is true that doctors sometimes make mistakes, they are still often correct than wrong. In this matter, the individual is sovereign (Linville 204-5) and that each individual has the right to decide on personal matters. Second, opponents claim that such act goes against the Hippocratic Oath. It is said that doctors are not meant to harm patients, particularly through their profession. Killing them is harming them (Klampfer 7). This claim is understandable. However, there had been so many modifications of the Hippocratic Oath over the years because some of its doctrines are no longer appropriate with the existing society (Klampfer 11). For example, the first paragraph of the oath has been changed because swearing to Greek gods and goddesses may be considered offensive to one’s religion today. Abortion was also prohibited then, but is legal today under certain conditions. The oath also only refers to men, but women today also practice medicine already. Splitting fees with one’s teacher and promising to support their children are also not practiced today (Antoniou et al. 3075-7). Furthermore, such claim puts the legality of passive euthanasia in question. Passive euthanasia, if defined without any refinement, means allowing one to die by not doing anything to save the individual. Yet this action is deemed legal and morally right, probably because since death will occur “naturally,” no one is responsible for killing the person (Davis 846). People just fail to consider the action of inaction in passive euthanasia. In addition, this is perhaps rooted in the moral rule that killing is a sin and a crime, and since passive euthanasia “blames” no one for the person’s death, it is morally right (Davis 846). While passive euthanasia is good, the argument leading to it is bothering. It just means that people do not understand the morality against killing. The idea circles not in preserving every single life, but in protecting the welfare of people to have the right to choose between life and death. Thus, if an individual is able to exercise this right to choose and the intention is not to inflict harm on anyone, then physician-assisted suicide is morally right. Third, opponents claim that active euthanasia will put morality on a downward spiral (Hyde 69). Again, this is perhaps rooted in the fact that there is a law against killing, but not an understanding of the reason for such law. Euthanasia in an act of mercy (Hyde 73), and bestowing mercy is a moral act. On a personal stance, turning the head and the heart away from a suffering person is a cruel act. Not giving the person his or her right to choose regarding matter of personal concern is not morally right either. It is a deprival of a right. Allowing a person to decide to have dignity is death is morally right. This is why despite the differences in cultures and traditions, deaths are dealt with importantly in every society. Dying and suffering individuals’ basic human rights are violated when they are deprived of the ability to decide, which is tantamount to being stripped of dignity. If people have the right to decide on how their remains will be disposed of (Hyde 78), they naturally should have the right to decide to choose between suffering and death. Endings represent closures, finalities, and consummations. They provide an insight regarding the link between the means and the goals. What is morally incorrect is to deprive humans of this chance to end things with dignity if they are insufferably ill because deciding to make people live despite their suffering and against their will is similar to deciding to kill them without valid reason and against their will. Active euthanasia, when the only alternatives left to end the suffering are miracle and death, is a personal right, is as morally correct as passive euthanasia, and bestows dignity in death. It is true that there will always be chances of abuse and misinterpretations (Green 656), but so do half of the choices available for everyone. To legalize it would require long brainstorming sessions, long talks, and so many detailed dissecting of parts. However, these are small things when compared to the enormity of the result in terms of the lives of the people who will be affected. This will not happen if people continue to put active euthanasia in a bad light. Death is always a taboo subject --- grim and gruesome, but this should not prevent people from really evaluating and thinking about things that could make it a little less grim and gruesome. If still not convinced, then maybe it would help to imagine being a witness to the intolerable suffering of a previously active and strong young man, now fully deteriorating, diagnosed with 3 months to live, and in constant insufferable pain that requires strong drugs that would ease the pain, yet render him unconscious for the rest of the day. Every time he is conscious, he sees the tormented look of his mother, his wife, and his only child. He has pleaded many times to have a quick death due to extreme physical, mental, and emotional torture not only to him, but to all those who love him. In the heart and mind, active euthanasia would be the best answer to this. Sadly, some people would not allow it because for them, it is still morally wrong and is a total disregard for the sanctity of life. Works Cited Antoniou, SA, GA Antoniou, FA Granderath, A Mavroforou, AD Giannoukas, and AI Antoniou. "Reflections of the Hippocratic Oath in Modern Medicine." World Journal of Surgery. 34.12 (2010): 3075-9. Print. Davis, A. "Legalising Active Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. Patients Need Medical Help to Live with Dignity Until They Die Naturally." Bmj (clinical Research Ed.). 324.7341 (2002). Print. Green, K. "Physician-assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Safeguarding against the "slippery Slope"-the Netherlands Versus the United States." Indiana International & Comparative Law Review. 13.2 (2003): 639-81. Print. Hyde, Michael J. "Defining ‘Human Dignity’ in the Debate Over the (im)morality of Physician-Assisted Suicide." Journal of Medical Humanities. 22.1 (2001): 69-82. Print. Linville, JE. "Physician-assisted Suicide As a Constitutional Right." The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 24.3 (1996): 198-206. Print. Klampfer, Friderik. "Suicide, Euthanasia and Human Dignity." Acta Analytica. 16 (2001): 7-34. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Moral argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Moral argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1474767-moral-argument
(Moral Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Moral Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/english/1474767-moral-argument.
“Moral Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1474767-moral-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Moral Evaluation on Euthanasia

Physician-Assisted Suicide for the Terminally Ill

This research proposal "Physician-Assisted Suicide for the Terminally Ill" discusses Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) and euthanasia or Mercy killing which are some highly controversial topics in contemporary societies in America and in other parts of the world.... Even though the major objective remains the same, PAS and euthanasia are implemented differently.... On the other hand, euthanasia is a type of killing which is normally performed without taking the permission of the patient....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Sociology - Euthanasia for Babies

euthanasia for Babies Name University euthanasia for Babies In a news article written by Jim Holt, published in The New York Times, dated July, 10th 2005, the controversial topic regarding infant euthanasia has been discussed.... Moreover, the report highlights two physicians who practiced in the Netherlands and had published in one of the medical journal, an entire set of guidelines that they called infant euthanasia.... He continues to call it a continuous ‘injury for the infant' and he supports the idea of infant euthanasia, calling it progressive as it denies continuing or prolonging of an infant's suffering (Holt 2011)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Euthanasia, Merciful or Merciless

This essay dwells on a contradictory issue - the attitude towards euthanasia.... It is mentioned, in the past few years Montana, Washington and, to a lesser extent, Texas have joined Oregon in legalizing euthanasia, also referred to as “doctor assisted suicide” or “mercy killing”.... According to the author of the text, the issue of euthanasia seldom discussed in the political or public areas but it is soon to become more prominent.... Reportedly,a controversial subject for hundreds of years, the legality of euthanasia is slowly becoming more accepted as a humane method of ending the suffering of a terminally ill patient....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

An Evolutionary Perspective of Euthanasia

The paper "An Evolutionary Perspective of Euthanasia" discusses that the working plan is open to changes and there is a consideration for changes in certain aspects of the paper, although it will already focus on the evolutionary perspective on euthanasia.... .... ... ...
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Veterinary Practice Management Ethical Dilemma: An animal is surrendered to your clinic for euthanasia

Animal euthanasia Name: Instructor: Task: Date: Animal euthanasia Animal euthanasia refers to the act of influencing humane death in an animal.... euthanasia procedures are designed to create minimal distress and pain on a given animal.... In spite of the significant responsibility that veterinary doctors invest in killing such animals, there are notable ethical scenarios that arise in administering euthanasia on animals....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

An Evolutionary Perspective on Euthanasia

This research proposal "An Evolutionary Perspective on euthanasia" responds to the literature gap and to further study a personal concern regarding the evolution of beliefs in and practices of euthanasia.... Aside from the determined gap in the literature, the study on euthanasia from an evolutionary perspective has personal roots.... Most studies that came up are focused on eugenics and its practices, which are related to the evolutionary perspective, such as Persaud's (2007) analysis and the works of Benedict, Shields, and ODonnell (2009) and Berghs, Casterlé, and Gastmans, (2007) on euthanasia programs during Nazi Germany times....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Proposal

Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia and the Right to Die

This essay "Assisted Suicide, euthanasia and the Right to Die" focuses on a legislated killing of human beings, so it comes to be a controversial issue, especially in cases when medical indications are bounded with the life quality.... Accept or not accept euthanasia is a purely private issue.... euthanasia is also a very delicate issue.... While talking about euthanasia we discuss the legislated killing of a human being.... he word "euthanasia" was firstly used in the XVII century by Francis Bacon to define pleasant death....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Philosophy of Human Rights and Views on Euthanasia

The author of the paper "The Philosophy of Human Rights and Views on euthanasia" will begin with the statement that the right to life is a demand to avoid any violation of either the biological or physical integrity of an individual.... euthanasia has brought about a lot of controversies throughout the world on issues regarding the right to life (Albanese, 1996.... euthanasia is referred to as the act of shortening life painlessly so as to end suffering where the patient is not expected to recover....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us